AI Text Detector

We analyze linguistic patterns to detect AI-generated text — showing you not just a score, but the why behind every verdict. No black boxes. No guesswork. 99.5% accuracy.

0 / 5000 words

AI wrote it. We’ll catch it

// FACTS ONLY — NO VECTOR VIBES

Lightning Fast

Results in under 10 seconds — even for long articles and research papers

No Limits

Unlimited checks. No hidden fees, no paywalls, no surprise limits

Real Linguistic Analysis

We don't just guess. We use proven linguistic techniques

Detects 10+ AI Models

GPT-5.5+, Claude 4.7+, Gemini, LLaMA, DeepSeek, Mistral, and others

100% Private

Your text is transmitted encrypted and never stored permanently

Premium: PDF Report

Get a detailed report with highlights, scores, and methodology breakdown

Analysis Results

How It Works

Get detailed, sentence-by-sentence analysis with color-coded results in seconds

Example Results
High AI Probability Detected
2.4s
3 sentences
Overall Score87.3%AI-Generated
AI (70-100%)
Mixed (40-69%)
Human (0-39%)

Sentence-by-Sentence Analysis

Artificial intelligence has revolutionized numerous industries by automating complex tasks.

92.4%
Likely AI

However, this rapid technological advancement raises important ethical considerations.

54.1%
Mixed

My grandmother always said, "Technology is a tool, not a replacement for human judgment."

18.7%
Likely Human
Upgrade to Premium to see why each sentence was flagged
Trusted Worldwide

Built for Everyone

Trusted across education, content creation, and business.

Teachers & Educators

Verify assignment authenticity and maintain academic integrity.

50K+ educators
Bulk document scanning
Class management tools
Student history tracking
50K+
Educators
200K+
Students
100K+
Writers
5K+
Companies
Pricing

Simple, Transparent

Choose the plan that works for you. Cancel anytime.

Monthly Plan

Pay as you go. Cancel anytime.

$19.99/month
Everything you need
Unlimited text analysis
Sentence-by-sentence breakdown
25+ detection methods
Batch processing (up to 100 files)
Export to PDF
Historical data retention
Priority queue
Testimonials

What real users say

From students to professors, writers to business owners

"I was paranoid my own essays would get flagged as AI because I use Grammarly. This tool gave me peace of mind. It showed my writing is fine."

Jessica M.

Senior, Michigan State

"My friend got accused of using ChatGPT. I ran his paper through this and it came back clean. He showed it to the professor and they dropped the case."

Tyler R.

Freshman, Community College

"I use it to double check my discussion posts before submitting. It caught a few sentences that sounded weird. Rewrote them and felt much better."

Amanda K.

Grad Student, NYU

"Some AI checkers say everything is AI. This one is more balanced. It correctly identified my original work as human. That's rare."

Carlos G.

Undergrad, UCLA

"I need evidence before I talk to a student about potential AI use. This tool gives me sentence level feedback that I can actually use in a conversation."

Dr. Laura H.

English Professor

"Our department tried three different detectors. This was the only one that didn't cause a ton of false positives."

Michael S.

High School Teacher

"Editors are getting strict about AI. I check everything before I hit send. This detector has never let me down. No false flags."

Rachel P.

Freelance Journalist

"I run client submissions through this. It catches AI content that other tools miss. My clients appreciate the extra quality control."

David L.

Copy Editor

"I hire writers for my blog. One guy was clearly using AI but charging human rates. This detector proved it. Saved me hundreds of dollars."

Nina T.

Small Business Owner

"The tool my university was using kept flagging real student work. This one doesn't. Made my case to the department chair."

Patricia M.

Professor, Community College

"Tried a few other tools. They kept telling me my human-written papers were AI. Frustrating. This one actually gets it right most of the time."

Daniel P.

PhD Candidate, History Department

"After testing against thousands of samples, this detector had the lowest false positive rate."

Independent user study

Research & Methodology

Built on peer-reviewed science

Our detection engine uses validated linguistic metrics from leading academic institutions

Perplexity

Measures text predictability. Lower perplexity indicates higher likelihood of AI generation.

Source: Academic Radiology (Elek et al., 2025)
Median perplexity: Human 35.9 vs AI 21.2 (AUC=0.7794)
Burstiness

Analyzes sentence variation. Human writing has higher variability in length and structure.

Definition: "Burstiness refers to the variation in sentence structure and length. Human writing naturally has bursts and pauses, creating a rhythm."
— HumTech (UCLA, 2025)
Syntax Depth

Evaluates syntactic complexity and tree structure. AI tends to produce simpler, more uniform sentence trees.

Source: arXiv:2403.12984 (2025)
Human syntactic depth variance: 2.4x higher than AI
Peer-Reviewed Research

Machine-generated text detection prevents language model collapse

George Drayson, Emine Yilmaz and Vasileios Lampos Centre for Artificial Intelligence Department of Computer Science University College London, UK

As LLMs become increasingly prevalent, they risk creating a future where machine-generated content dilutes human-authored text.

Large Language Model Generated Text Detection: A Systematic Survey

Wu, J., Yang, S., Zhan, R., Yuan, Y., & Wang, D. (2024). Tsinghua University & Peking University

Comprehensive meta-analysis of 150+ detection methods with published benchmarks and standardized metrics

RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learning

Hu, X., Chen, P. Y., & Ho, T. Y. (2023). IBM Research & University of Illinois

Introduced an adversarial training framework that maintains detection accuracy across multiple LLM architectures

MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detection

Chakraborty, S., Bedi, A. S., Zhu, S., An, B., & Manocha, D. (2023). University of Maryland & Amazon AI

Evaluated 12 commercial detectors against 8 LLMs across 5 domains with statistical significance testing

Leading Researchers

James Zou

Stanford University, Biomedical Data Science

"Detectors typically evaluate content based on 'perplexity,' a metric that correlates with the sophistication of the writing..."

Stanford Study on AI Detectors (2023)

Read →

Daphne Ippolito

Google Brain, Senior Research Scientist

"Automatic detection of generated text is easiest when humans are fooled" — research paper (ACL 2020) examining human ability to detect AI-generated text.

ACL 2020

Read →

Eric Mitchell

Stanford University, PhD Candidate

"We need a new level of infrastructure and tools to provide guardrails around these models," says Mitchell, whose research achieving 95% accuracy in detecting LLM outputs.

Stanford HAI (2023)

Read →

Chelsea Finn

Stanford University, Assistant Professor of CS

"The general public needs more tools for knowing when we are reading model-generated text."

Stanford HAI (2023)

Read →
Key Findings from Academic Research
89% accuracy — Veritext detection model (ensemble learning combining XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost)
95% accuracy — DetectGPT method (Stanford) in identifying LLM-generated text
<2% false positive — achieved by leading perplexity-based detectors in third-party evaluations (BBC Tech reporting, 2023)
arXiv:2507.10475 — First systematic comparison of diffusion vs AR text detection
FAQ

AI Detector — Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about our AI checker, detection methodology, and plans.

An AI detector (also called AI checker) is a tool that analyzes text to determine whether it was written by a human or generated by artificial intelligence models like ChatGPT, GPT-5, Gemini, or Llama. Our detector uses three core linguistic metrics: perplexity (text predictability), burstiness (sentence length variability), and entropy (word choice randomness). Lower perplexity, low burstiness, and lower entropy typically indicate AI-generated content. These methods are based on peer-reviewed research from Stanford, UCLA, and AISTATS 2025.

AI Detector · AI Checker · ChatGPT Detector · GPT-5 Detector · Perplexity · Burstiness · Entropy
Trusted by thousands of educators, students, writers, and businesses. Our linguistic model is based on peer-reviewed research. For bulk scanning, API access, and professional reports — upgrade to Premium.